Moderation vs Abstinence: Should You Cut Back, or Quit Drinking?

controlled drinking vs abstinence

If you are struggling with some of the following signs above, be sure to contact your physician or seek help at a substance abuse treatment facility.

controlled drinking vs abstinence

Eligibility criteria

controlled drinking vs abstinence

We thank the study authors who provided data and extra information for this review, including the Project MATCH executive committee for providing the Project MATCH public dataset for the secondary analysis. The authors acknowledge that the reported results are, in whole or in part, based on analyses of the Project MATCH Public Data Set. These data were collected as part of a multisite clinical trial of alcoholism treatments supported by a series of grants from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and made available to the authors by the Project MATCH Research Group. This article has not been reviewed or endorsed by the Project MATCH Research Group and does not necessarily represent the opinions of its members, who are not responsible for the contents. Randomised controlled trials comparing two or more interventions that could be used in primary care.

controlled drinking vs abstinence

Study Characteristics

  • With the support of an expert Care Team, many people begin their journey by gradually reducing their weekly alcohol consumption.The idea of moderation and mindful drinking is also a great way for people who are asking themselves “should I stop drinking?
  • We also discuss study limitations relevant to refining definitions of recovery, with a particular focus on advancing research on recovery from AUD.
  • In addition, while controlled drinking becomes less likely the more severe the degree of alcoholism, other factors—such as age, values, and beliefs about oneself, one’s drinking, and the possibility of controlled drinking—also play a role, sometimes the dominant role, in determining successful outcome type.
  • We define nonabstinence treatments as those without an explicit goal of abstinence from psychoactive substance use, including treatment aimed at achieving moderation, reductions in use, and/or reductions in substance-related harms.
  • There is less research examining the extent to which moderation/controlled use goals are feasible for individuals with DUDs.

Alcoholism is a complex issue characterised by a range of behavioural, physical, and psychological factors. It’s not an easy road to lasting recovery, but with the right support and resources, it can definitely be a journey worth taking. The crucial factor here isn’t necessarily which path you choose but having a supportive network around you who respects and understands your decision.

controlled drinking vs abstinence

3. The harm reduction movement

controlled drinking vs abstinence

Whether you’re considering moderation or complete abstinence, this article will provide information about how to begin an Alcohol Moderation Management (AMM), its effectiveness, potential drawbacks, and its applicability to people dealing with alcoholism. Second, research using the NESARC-III data found that risk of AUD continues to increase well beyond the 4+/5+ cutpoints, with risk increasing through approximately 10 drinks for women and 11 drinks for men alcohol abstinence vs moderation (Linden-Carmichael et al., 2019). Thus, the 4+/5+ drink threshold does not offer a useful dimension to characterize levels of AUD severity, as emphasized in DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, and, conversely, it is inadequate to characterize risk reduction during a recovery attempt. Abstinence is not the only solution for recovering from alcohol use disorders, but it is one of the most studied and successful methods for recovering from alcohol use disorders.

  • After relistening to the interviews and scrutinizing transcripts, the material was categorized and summarized by picking relevant parts from each transcript.
  • The analytical strategy for the present study was consistent with the primary COMBINE report (Anton et al., 2006).
  • Thus, the 4+/5+ drink threshold does not offer a useful dimension to characterize levels of AUD severity, as emphasized in DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, and, conversely, it is inadequate to characterize risk reduction during a recovery attempt.

A key point in Miller’s theory is that motivation for change is “action-specific”; he argues that no one is “unmotivated,” but that people are motivated to specific actions or goals (Miller, 2006). Despite the growth of the harm reduction movement globally, research and implementation of nonabstinence treatment in the U.S. has lagged. Furthermore, abstinence remains a gold standard treatment outcome in pharmacotherapy research for drug use disorders, even after numerous calls for alternative metrics of success (Volkow, 2020).

  • Further, analyses revealed several drinking goal × CBI interactions such that the benefit of cognitive behavioral intervention over medical management was not supported for participants whose reported goal was complete abstinence.
  • This multifaceted approach helps you develop coping mechanisms while fostering healthier habits that can sustain long-term recovery.
  • While moderation may be more achievable for those with a mild or moderate diagnosis than those with severe alcohol use disorder, it’s also a great starting point for those exploring making a change.
  • As MM rules allow men to drink up to 14 alcoholic beverages per week, there is growing evidence that these may be dangerous guidelines.

The effectiveness of these programmes can greatly vary depending on several factors such as treatment duration, individual factors, and programme challenges. The FHE Health team is committed to providing accurate information that adheres to the https://ecosoberhouse.com/ highest standards of writing. If one of our articles is marked with a ‘reviewed for accuracy and expertise’ badge, it indicates that one or more members of our team of doctors and clinicians have reviewed the article further to ensure accuracy.

Study Screening and Selection